Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquest Air Cargo Flight 504

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conquest Air Cargo Flight 504[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Not notable cargo plane crash. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable enough. A commercial airliner destroyed and one probable death is close but an older aircraft on a cargo flight doesn't cut it. - Samf4u (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While I will abstain from making a recommendation as to the fate of this article, as I do not know what I am about to point out means in terms of the subject's notability and want to leave that determination to more experienced editors, I do wish to make the community aware that unlike many other comparable incidents, this event was considered noteworthy enough to merit coverage on at least one national network news show. See https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/one-rescued-after-plane-crashes-into-ocean-off-miami-1439830083584 Pizzaguy875 (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I cant see anything in this accident that makes it noteworthy for a stand-alone article, no passengers so nobody notable killed and nothing important hit, it is unlikely to involve a major change in regulations. Sad but cargo aircraft accidents are not that rare or notable. MilborneOne (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MilborneOne. Cargo plane crashes are not so easily to find notable as are passenger airliner crashes. Edison (talk) 22:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Well, the C-131 still flying 63 years after the production run, over ocean is a tad interesting. However, I don't see all that much coverage for this crash and I strongly doubt there will be persisting continuing coverage. Icewhiz (talk) 07:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There was one fatality, alas, but this crash lacks notability, as harsh as that may seem.TH1980 (talk) 21:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. There were only two people inside and probably only one died. Since this was not an important plane crash, no regulations, further investigation (mostly only basic investigation), safety redevelopments, etc. were done afterwards. And there isn't really much reliable information. --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Not notable. MA Javadi (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.