Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Traut
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Connor Traut[edit]
- Connor Traut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A auto biographical article by a high school student. Claim to notability is that he is the ABA BMX "13 Rookie" National Champion, although the source used [1], shows he came second in a junior class. I don't believe this meet WP:BIO generally, since there is no verifiable, third party coverage to show this is significant. I also think it fails WP:ATHLETE, since I believe the intention of "Competitors who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports" is to cover Olympic-level athletes, not one of several hundred junior competitors in this competition. Gwernol 07:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Inflated claims. Fails WP:ATHLETE--clearly a second place novice finish in an underage category isn't competing at the highest level of sport, nor is it a national championship, which the article asserts. As per the excellent nom, clearly fails WP:BIO generally, insufficient third-party coverage by reliable sources. Darkspots (talk) 13:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unreferenced mess. As nominator points out, claims are inflated, although I do like the bit about the rock band. TN‑X-Man 17:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Fails WP:BIO and WP:ATHLETE. Non-notable and unreferenced. Should it have been speedied?Yobmod (talk) 11:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just FYI, both speedy and Prod deletions have already been tried for this article, hence the AfD discussion. Best, Gwernol 11:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.