Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Holliday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Already deleted vis BLPPROD. Michig (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Connor Holliday[edit]

Connor Holliday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although I think he may be notable, this article is written by an user with the same name as this article and the quality is really low Sports Devotee (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Holliday apparently plays for Whitehaven RLFC, which is a Championship side, and therefore does not meet WP:RLN. I cannot find any coverage of him sufficient for WP:GNG, either in Google News or on a general search. Therefore does not appear to be notable. (it is worth noting that simply being written by a user with a COI and being of low quality are not valid reasons for deletion, but reasons for improving the article) Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 14:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as too soon as this is basically unsourced and there's no other context to suggest otherwise convincingly keeping. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.