Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connecticut Fever

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, article has been renamed to Cassie's second studio album. GlassCobra 10:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Connecticut Fever[edit]

no sources, pure crystal ball violation Kww (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: No source for title, not enough information from its one source to get beyond a stub. Thus, it's a stub that can't justify existing under this name.Kww (talk) 15:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "No sources" is not true—almost all of the information is taken from an article in Billboard that is specifically about the album. Before I !vote, I'd like to see if anyone can add a little more coverage. Unlike most "forthcoming album" articles, this one isn't full of speculation and rumor (except for the title) and does have at least one piece of non-trivial coverage. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 15:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 15:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cassie or, at the very least, move to Cassie's second album (or similar). One article is slim coverage, but it's reliable and Hello Control has done a good job cleaning out much of the cruft. (Incidentally, if we can't find a source for it in this article Official Girl should probably go away.) This article was likely created with this title because of the earlier deletion of other articles that seem to have been out there (IIRC) at one point Untitled Cassie Album, Still Cassie, Cassie's Sophmore Album, etc. In any case, without a source for the title, it has to at least move. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I definitely agree re: the move. I put a cite req on the title and was going to give it a few days before moving it. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 15:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It would seem that if Kww agrees the sourced info is solid, we can just merge this bad boy and all go home happy. (Incidentally, an earlier version was axed. A look at that Talk page leaves me with little hope we'll find a source for the title "Connecticut Fever".) - Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This album is being released on May 20, so right now, there's no real reason to have it. Everything on this page is on Cassie's page anyway. Corn.u.co.pia Discussion 10:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't really think that merge is an appropriate answer, here. After merging, a redirect is left in place from the old title to the new. In this case, the unsourced information is the title itself ... there should be no redirected from Connecticut Fever to anything at all.Kww (talk) 15:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is dispute over the tracks every 5 seconds. Delete the page. Corn.u.co.pia Discussion 04:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note - Page has been protected for 2 days to prevent IPs adding incorrect information per a protection request at RFP. Rudget . 16:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to an untitled album. The Billboard article is a sufficient source for album notability and means that the article is not WP:CRYSTAL (nothing in the article is unverified speculation). —Torc. ^(Talk.) 05:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.