Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confluence (software) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SNOW. Bad faith and/or misguided nomination. ‑Scottywong | chat _ 23:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confluence (software)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another spammy, promotional, non-notable software article. This software product does not meet our general notability guideline. Almost all sources are the company's website. Delete. CitizenNeutral (talk) 19:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: Nominator is on a deletion spree, see User talk:CitizenNeutral#Aggressive Deletions vol2. Already survived earlier deletion discussion with 100% keep votes last year, this nomination doesn't address why that decision should be overturned. -- intgr [talk] 23:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.