Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confianza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 12:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confianza[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be original research mainly through synthesis. DrStrauss talk 08:34, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 08:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No, this does not appear to be anything like original research mainly through synthesis. In a few seconds I found ISBN 9780816501083, a book largely devoted to this concept from a university publisher. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep - per good sourcing. Per WP:INDEPTH.BabbaQ (talk) 17:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Based on the available sources and my web research, no justification for this article. Article and sources fail to establish that Confianza is widely considered unique in the literature versus Trust (emotion). If it was established as moderately unique, e.g. a regional/cultural variance, a redirect/merge solution would still be in order. As literature stands right now, Confianza should be (and is) trust on es.wiki. I consider the en.wiki for Confianza a WP:FRINGE article with elements of WP:OR. gidonb (talk) 05:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.