Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condylar decompression

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Condylar decompression[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOT. We are not a guide of how to, which is what the article is. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily delete and allow restart for a better article as this may actually be acceptable and have potential but simply not with its current version. For example, I found some helpful links here and here. SwisterTwister talk 08:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With a very minor re-write it would be a very decent stub. Brycehughes (talk) 15:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 03:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've zapped the how-to bit, and added a few of many available refs. The topic is well attested. No doubt someone with suitable knowledge can write something decent on it, but notability is not an issue. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree that the article has been improved to where it qualifies as establishing notability and a stub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thisisnotatest (talk • contribs) 07:59, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.