Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concur (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sr13 01:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Concur[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Articles for deletion/Concur
- Articles for deletion/Concur (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Concurrency (road)
- Articles for deletion/Concurrent Voting
- Articles for deletion/Concurrent average memory access time
- Articles for deletion/Concurrent relation
- Articles for deletion/Concurrent user
- Articles for deletion/Concurring opinion
Procedural nomination. This article appears to be about a quasi-notable corporation, but the author has an apparent conflict of interest, and User:Veinor deleted a previous version as spam. Note that the previous AFD is unrelated. YechielMan 02:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article might benefit from careful copyediting, but the company is notable. I added references to "top 100" lists compiled by Business 2.0 and BusinessWeek. --Eastmain 05:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I agree with Eastmain, minor editing may help. This company was just named to the Seattle Times NW 100 list at #4 and agree that the company is notable. I added the reference. --codycat13
- Keep. They're one of the original SaaS companies. Analyst firm IDC has them ranked as one of the largest on-demand service providers based on revenue. Soxrox 01:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)soxrox[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.