Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer assisted selling
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, Unsourced, non notable neologism. Merge proponents could certainly add a sentence or two to customer relationship management with a soucr, without a merge. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Computer assisted selling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:35, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reliable sources exist. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]--neonwhite user page talk 03:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak merge with customer relationship management, an established buzzword which this is trying to supplant. --Dhartung | Talk 04:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak merge with customer relationship management. Agree with Dhartung. As a marketer, I've heard of the term, but would always categorize it under CRM. PRasmussen (talk) 10:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, strongly: "a new emerging trend in sales systems," i.e. a non-notable neologism. Seems obviously promotional in intent. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable neologism. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Orphaned article has blog editorial as its sole cite source. It's clearly a neologism. Orphaned articles are usually orphaned for a reason. B.Wind (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. A mention in CRM might be suitable, but I don't feel strongly about that. Frank | talk 23:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Merge as suggested. Bearian (talk) 19:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.