Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Hearts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Computer Hearts

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Computer Hearts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a short film, not properly referenced as passing WP:NFO. The notability claim here is that it won the Audience Choice award at a minor film festival, sourced only to that festival's own self-published website about itself -- but our notability criteria for films only confer notability based on awards from major, internationally prominent film festivals (TIFF, Cannes, Berlin, Sundance, Venice, etc.) whose awards get covered by reliable sources as news, and a non-notable award that doesn't get media coverage cannot make its winners notable for winning it.
But the rest of the referencing here is to WordPress blogs (many of which are defunct) rather than WP:GNG-worthy sources, which means it can't be claimed to pass the notability criteria for films on "critical attention" grounds either. Bearcat (talk) 14:49, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 14:49, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No participants so far.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.