Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of project risk analysis software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 20:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of project risk analysis software[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Product catalog violating WP:CSC (non-notable entries in an incomplete list), WP:V (just adding an unspecific root domain in each row is not "sourcing", the entire page uses exactly zero independent sources), WP:OR (a lot of the content seems to be based on the original author's own research and analysis of these products). This comparison fails several basic content requirements and should be deleted (or re-draftified). Wikipedia is not a host for personal research results, nor a directory for indiscriminate unsourced information (WP:NOT). GermanJoe (talk) 10:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a directory. None of the entries in this list have their own articles. List is not sourced well enough to meet WP:OR requirements. — Newslinger talk 15:41, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT. Most list entries are non notable and content is poorly referenced (there are refs that don't point to anything in there). Ajf773 (talk) 20:18, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT, WP:CSC, and WP:V.--1l2l3k (talk) 18:56, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.