Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of homeowner associations and civic associations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Neighborhood association. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of homeowner associations and civic associations[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

10 years later, User:Missvain's PROD concerns hold true: the article fails WP:GNG and is WP:OR. Its synthesis would will remain the latter unless WP:reliable sources could be found that extensively compare these associations. The top search results ([1][2]) are merely 4 paragraphs. Scholarly sources are unlikely to provide necessary comparison [3][4]. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 02:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Wow, what a flashback! I confirm with the noms assessment. Still fails GNG and OR. Thank you for tagging me. Missvain (talk) 03:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Neighborhood association: and source properly. Owen× ☎ 11:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge if you can find sources. I assume its different in different nations. Dream Focus 19:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no clear merge target (why NA and not HOA, or other similar topics)? And even if there were, nothing here is sourced, so there's nothing to merge anyway. If you want to flesh out content at any similar articles, then do it de novo. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 22:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.