Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of browser synchronizers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of browser synchronizers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Massively-outdated comparison of a tiny number of entries on a non-notable subject, compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of DNA melting prediction software (Browser synchronization is not a notable subject) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:39, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Software, and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Browser synchronization. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, so Soft Deletion is not an option here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: If "browser synchronization" is not a notable subject then there's no need for this list, and as nom pointed out, it's likely outdated and obsolete anyway. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Mooonswimmer 15:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The technology is effectively a checkmark for most browsers now with few requiring third-party tools to sync settings any longer, and these are for the most part depreciated tools. Nate • (chatter) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I take issue with the claim that Browser synchronization is not a notable subject. The cited discussion had input from one other editor and they advocated a merge, not the redirect that happened. Here are a few recent sources establishing notability of the topic: [1]], [2], [3]. The fact that the article is out of date is not a reason to delete it. If a list article is not desireable here, the good content in the list could be merged into a restored Browser synchronization article. ~Kvng (talk) 13:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see the article was actually created to compare standalone software in 2006 when there was no sync feature in browsers but it's evolved into comparing browser features now. The thing is, it's a standard feature now and pretty much same in all browsers and there is not much to compare anymore anyway, it looks useless now. Tehonk (talk) 03:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.