Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of .NET obfuscators
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of .NET obfuscators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an orphan article, and it is simply a list displaying a grid. There is absolutely no reputable source for any of this (hard to know if the products and/or companies even exist!), and there is no indication that the topic is notable or even if any of the companies/products described are notable. Finally, it appears the article only has one true editor (all others made minor tweaks and/or added tagging comments). I cannot find a reason to keep this article. Timneu22 (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 05:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, simply a report without proper references, little encyclopedic value. JIP | Talk 06:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.