Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CompareXpress (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 09:39, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CompareXpress

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No Indication of significance. A vanity article and it doesn't appear to me that this small company meets our notability standards. Ireneshih (talk) 11:12, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A vanity article that references multiple news reports in The Straits Times and several other reliable sources? --Hildanknight (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an advert cobbled together from a bombardment of minor mentions, none providing any depth of coverage about this business. Per Wikipedia's five pillars, Wikipedia is not an advertising platform, delete this spam. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 01:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there are reliable independent sources here. Though I agree with User:Duffbeerforme, this is an advertisement, this article needs Cleanup. XiuBouLin (talk) 02:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.