Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community First Credit Union

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge Elcom Credit Union into Community First Credit Union. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Community First Credit Union[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google search brings up sources that mostly consist of user-contributed content, or are otherwise unreliable. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 09:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as no evidence of notability is given. 73.222.28.191 (talk) 02:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from article on its predecessor Elcom_Credit_Union, which was considered worth keeping in 2008: Noyster (talk), 09:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

while 7 years ago a sourceless article somehow managed to pass an AfD, that does not mean that the same would happen today -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Elcom Credit Union, per Noyster. Dismas|^(talk) 10:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
if evidence of WP:CORP or WP:GNG can be established for either CFCU or Elcom, then merge. otherwise delete both. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Elcom Credit Union. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 22:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge from Elcom Credit Union, and search for better independent sources. This is likely to be notable, (as it claims to be the largest in the region, and has Australia's lowest rate credit card), even though we haven't found much evidence yet. Best probably to search off line in Sydney public libraries. Here is one piece of significant coverage: [1] (Sydney Morning Herald). --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 12:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: Consensus is clearly headed toward a merge, but two of the merge !votes state to merge content from Elcom Credit Union, two state to merge to it, and one just states to merge or delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why we would list a business under a name that it doesn't go by anymore. So, why not merge the info at Elcom into this article which has the current name of the credit union? Dismas|^(talk) 19:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dismas's clarified !vote just leaves @Gobonobo:'s comment, that implies merging into the article with the old name. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.