Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist Chinese Olympic Accountability Bill
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that this is not notable. Davewild (talk) 18:20, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Communist Chinese Olympic Accountability Bill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Merely a legislative proposal. No real notability; no evidence it even exists (the link is broken). Biruitorul Talk 22:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -[1] Introduced months ago, not even debated yet. Olympics will be over by the time Congress is back in session. No brainer. -Inzweep (talk) 22:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per Inzweep. This is one bill that won't even go in the history books of failed bills. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 22:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Inzweep. It will be redundant in a few days time when the Olympics start on August 8. Artene50 (talk) 03:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see any evidence this is more notable than any of the other bills pigeonholed in committee. --Phirazo 15:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This should be placed/merged to another article about Chinese Olympics, but until this is done, I would keep to ensure that valid content was not lost.Biophys (talk) 14:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Concerns over the 2008 Summer Olympics is already 49K. I don't see how this is important/notable enough to add to that article. I'd like to see an independent source before I'd support a merge. --Phirazo 21:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.