Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Language (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 08:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Common Language (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BAND, non-notable; unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. JMHamo (talk) 00:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Of the two releases on Blast First, the EP only has three tracks, two of which were also on the later full album. So it's arguable that only the full album release would be relevant towards WP:NMUSIC, not quite meeting it. I agree that there's likely pre-internet coverage out there somewhere - the challenge is locating it to satisfy the coverage for WP:GNG. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 06:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake - I had thought both albums had been released on Blast First. Yes, Google is often a poor guide to pre-internet notability. --Michig (talk) 07:51, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Two regular albums. one album on Mute Records. No reason for deletion. --RivetHeadCulture (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete with offer to userfy. Only one album was on a major label, so does not satisfy WP:NMUSIC. I believe that pre-internet references likely exists - but until they can be tracked down so as to satisfy WP:V, this does not currently meet WP:GNG. Potential userfication will allow for further work to locate any such sources. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 19:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.