Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee for Sydney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Committee for Sydney[edit]

Page was deleted as civil spam and has now been recreated. The author has an obvious conflict of interest, although he/she has setup a new account to try and conceal it. The page does nothing but promote the said institution and the vast majority of the citations are from the institution's website. MvjsTalking 02:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per CSD G4. TallNapoleon (talk) 03:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This page indicates plenty of breakfasts and luncheons, but seemingly few significant achievements. Non-notable lobby group? WWGB (talk) 03:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete though I'd love to join them for lunch. There's no apparent real-world importance here. Drmies (talk) 03:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, they are a group of businessmen (along with Committee for Melbourne) who lobby governments, and I used to prepare briefs for politicians for meetings with it. I'm not sure what impact they have.--Grahame (talk) 05:00, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless there's a fundamental rewrite it's spam. Lacks third party sources to establish notability. Michellecrisp (talk) 03:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.