Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commercial diplomacy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Further discussion can continue on WP:CP and WP:COIN for the copyright and conflict of interest issues, if needed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Commercial diplomacy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Commercial diplomacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was created by one of the authors of the sources. Then it was continued by an account apparently connected to one of the organizations mentioned in the article. Its edit history is full of copyvio, and the latest version is still full of traces of such copyvio. It's also a complete WP:COATRACK for the Association of Certified Commercial Diplomats and Institute for Trade and Commercial Diplomacy, which doesn't seem to be notable. MarioGom (talk) 21:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 21:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

• Keep The topic is quite notable as entire books are written about it. The deficiencies of the current draft are quite normal problems which addressed by ordinary editing, not deletion per WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE; WP:IMPERFECT; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:PRESERVE; &c. Andrew D. (talk) 00:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

• Keep I have removed the coatrack content and most of the copyright violations. See Earwig's Copyvio Detector for remaining infringement. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.