Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commercial Laser Tag Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unlikely people will be searching for "Commercial Laser Tag Systems", and consensus to delete, so no need for a redirect. Cirt (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial Laser Tag Systems

Wikipedia is not a directory. Why not just add phone numbers and addresses too? Wholly unencyclopedic - fails WP:LIST. ukexpat (talk) 20:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though dreadful to read, and lacking any structure or ability to transfer knowledge, the topic in itself is worthy an article. The solution is to rename it, remove 90% of the content, and rewrite the remaining 10%, not deletion. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Isn't "lacking...ability to transfer knowledge" the definition of unencyclopedic?! – ukexpat (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SYNTH. Stifle (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it could be sourced, the only section potentially worth keeping is the first overview section, and that section doesn't warrant a separate article outside Lasertag. Sashaman (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xy7 (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just a long list of companies and what they do. KJS77 Join the Revolution 00:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No 3rd-party sources to establish that a list of equipment manufacurers is worth compiling. A list of notable systems that have WP articles would be acceptable, but since none of the systems appear notable at the time being that would be premature. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note I went ahead and chopped the directory content, see if this looks any better, although it could certainly use more sources. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Without the directory, it looks like an expanded version of the "Equipment and technology" section of [Lasertag]. Move it there. Jjamison (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.