Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commando Jeep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jeep Wrangler. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commando Jeep

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly commercial promo; not a successful product, nor one remarkably innovative, etc. Might be worth a space in some other page, though. Anmccaff (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete— Preceding unsigned comment added by Winterysteppe (talk • contribs) 18:47, 16 March 2016‎

See WP:JUSTAVOTE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Jeep Wrangler.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 02:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as mentioned because this is not actually seriously needed for deletion and could've even been accepted as its own article if not for it perhaps being best connected to the Jeep Wrangler. SwisterTwister talk 05:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's worth noting that there have only been a handful of these produced, that they differ little from other COTS militarized Wranglers, and that the article began as all-but-outright commercial promo. Anmccaff (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:37, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.