Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commander in Chief (TV Movie)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commander in Chief (TV Movie)

Contested prod. As the article states, this TV movie of the ABC TV series Commander in Chief was "rumored" for about six months before it was announced the project was cancelled. It never even went into pre-production, and the most of the content is speculation and guesswork based on mentions in Geena Davis interviews. Canley 22:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. Projects like this get proposed and then axed all the time. It's the nature of the industry. If it matters enough to mention at all, it can fit as a sentence or two in the TV series's article. --Icarus ^(Hi!) 22:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as wholly non-notable. This would warrant a note or a section at Commander in Chief, but not a separate article. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 22:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL and because the couple of sentences already in the series article is more than enough to cover the topic. Otto4711 22:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My initial thought was to merge, but Commander in Chief already covers what would be 'merge-able' from this, at least until something more solid/definite is forthcoming. SkierRMH 00:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom _SUBWAYguy 02:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.