Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coming Home (2013 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:52, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coming Home (2013 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence the film has entered production: per WP:NFF. Sources provided have nothing to do with this film BOVINEBOY2008 13:33, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom; article has been repeatedly sourced to sources not mentioning the film, some of which were apparently cut-and-paste from another film article. Fails WP:NFF, and no sign of substantially notability that would overcome that standards. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for several reasons. First off, the film does not look to have started filming. Secondly, casting doesn't even appear to be fully finished. Thirdly, the film hasn't received enough sources to show that it passes WP:NFF. All of the sources I've found say the same thing, that the two actors are to star in the film and even then, I doubt that all of these sources are really all that usable. I more used them to show that the film isn't a hoax and that it is supposed to happen. Until it receives more coverage, this will be a delete. I have no issue with someone wanting to userfy the article until that point. It's possible it could eventually pass notability guidelines once it releases, but until then it just doesn't pass.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:34, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not Notable fails WP:NFF --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - For an unreleased film, it would be warrant inclusion if the production itself was notable. There is no evidence in the article of that and there are no reliable sources to be found. Holyfield1998 (talk) 14:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. A thing can exist and not (yet!) be notable. Once there are Reliable sources that discuss the production, or once the film's release is confirmed and imminent, an article might be appropriate. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. No evidence the film is in production or has entered principal photography. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 16:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.