Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comfibook
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:08, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comfibook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing serious or serious to be a part of Wikipedia. Definitely not notable to be here. Light2021 (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails WP:N. Finding zero coverage in reliable sources. North America1000 07:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: I am finding no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 07:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - not finding any significant coverage, not even a Crunchbase or AngelList entry, which would usually at least have possible pointers to coverage. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 17:31, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No third-party sources to establish notability of this garbage-ware. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:25, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO; only advertorial. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.