Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Come Baby Come
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. – Rich Farmbrough 20:26, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Come Baby Come[edit]
Stub for a song by an artist without an aritcle of their own. Notablility not established. FuriousFreddy 03:31, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The song is notable (I can hum it)- I think it's a a UK one-hit wonder. Online shop with some more info on it The Land 11:41, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Would it not be best to make an article for the artist, and mention the song there? --FuriousFreddy 13:59, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. If it's a one-hit wonder, I think it would be much more likely that users would search for this term instead. However, an additional redirect at the singer/band name may be appropriate, or perhaps the other way around (redirect from this search term to author page). --Jacquelyn Marie 16:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Whie it would seem better to do it the other way around (article on artists with song title as redirect), that isn't a bad suggestion, so long as someone expands the article to establish notability. --FuriousFreddy 17:05, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. If it's a one-hit wonder, I think it would be much more likely that users would search for this term instead. However, an additional redirect at the singer/band name may be appropriate, or perhaps the other way around (redirect from this search term to author page). --Jacquelyn Marie 16:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Would it not be best to make an article for the artist, and mention the song there? --FuriousFreddy 13:59, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and clean-up. Notable song and there's plenty of precedent for notable songs to have their own articles. 23skidoo 14:59, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep Song is notable, more notable than artist. So what? Roodog2k (Hello there!) 16:27, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It's one of the worst songs I've heard, but keep. Punkmorten 21:02, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to "K7". --fvw* 11:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep this too please the song is famous why should we erase an article about it that would not make sense to me Yuckfoo 19:13, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep per other reasons to keep. --SuperDude 02:40, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to "K7". If this guy is big enough to have a page of his own, then 'maybe' his song gets a page. As of now...non-notable.--Daniel Lotspeich 02:52, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Basically contentless article that doesn't seem to meet any of my personal criteria for what constitutes an encyclopedic song. -R. fiend 18:12, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.