Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comcast (religion)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted. Mushroom 04:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comcast (religion)[edit]

"With an estimated 3 followers, Comcast is arguably the smallest religion with more than one follower in the world." It was also (by the article's claims) created yesterday. Delete as vanity/hoax. Kusma (討論) 15:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can we speedy as a organisation/group with no claim of notability?15:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

*Delete This is a creative hoax. Lots of wang grease went into this one. Ruby 15:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-voting after vandalism by User:207.200.116.70

Delete This is a creative hoax. Lots of elbow grease went into this one. Ruby 15:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Don't delete This is a serious religion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Seenin (talk • contribs) 16:47, 22 January 2006
Delete, hoax bordering nonsense. Might even be a candidate for BJAODN (all followers will get free movies (and) TV shows...) - Phædriel ♥ ^{tell me} - 17:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Are you kidding about it being a serious religion? Comcast is the devil, if you ask me. Hurricanehink 17:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't care anymore. It's on Uncyclopedia now, anyways. Delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seenin (talk • contribs)
Delete (another deletionist rule: Any page that receives a "Don't delete" or "do not delete" from an unsigned IP user almost always should be deleted) but BJAODN. Daniel Case 18:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cautious Delete - not very encyclopaedic. Latinus 18:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete It is on uncyclopedia now [1], as Seenin the creator of the article said above (and he even voted to delete it)-- Astrokey44|talk 20:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This still hasn't been deleted? The people who delete things are slackers. Or there are thousands of articles for deletion. Seenin 00:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per CSD A7 - author requests deletion. I've tagged the article as such. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 03:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.