Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbus Free Press (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam ^Sing! 15:26, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Columbus Free Press[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally nominated around 9 months ago, this continues to be an article about a nonnotable alternative press that lacks the reliable sources necessary to sustain inclusion. While it has some attention in other non-noteworthy alternative underground publications, it has received scant attention in the mainstream or historically, and the sources listed at the prior discussion were, for the exception of coverage from the local NPR affiliate, all unreliable or minor. Still doesn't meet our standards for inclusion with no apparent hope of improvement. Thargor Orlando (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Well, during the 1970's this publication was certainly a notable communications resource in the Columbus, Ohio area, for a number of substantial reasons. I will try to find some credible sources to back this up -- am hoping that I will have a few weeks to do so. Thank you. Designquest10

Keep - agree with first AfD. It may not be as well know today, but WP:NTEMP. VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When was it notable? Where are the sources? Thargor Orlando (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per the solid keep and discussion of just last April. Nothing has changed except a renomination by the same editor who was unable to delete it last time. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the sources about the topic? Thargor Orlando (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.