Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colt 45 porn star
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Deizio talk 20:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Colt 45 porn star[edit]
An article about a porn star. Contested prod. Completely unreferenced, some of the material is completely unverifiable, and the article is completely unencyclopedic in its current state. No obvious claims to uniqueness. Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:V, WP:RS. Mr Stephen 22:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Deflate those things. NN. Edison 23:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- STONG KEEP I do not see anything wrong with the article or the Chelsea Charms one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.216.38.207 (talk) .
- Keep See nothing wrong here Maximounds
- The article for Maxi Mounds is also up for deletion as well. Alba 05:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Which makes no sense, putting out these artiles for deletion for no reasons should be considered vadelism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maximounds (talk • contribs) .- Totally agree, this deletion thing is vadelism.
- Maximounds is the creating editor. Mr Stephen 07:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article for Maxi Mounds is also up for deletion as well. Alba 05:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:V, and judging by the number of redlinks in the article, may be the beginning of an ad campaign. Resolute 04:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-The red links are video's Colt 45 has appeared in. They are red because there is no official Wikipedia page of description of them. Quite useless to delete the page for that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maximounds (talk • contribs) . ("keep" added by 69.214.3.56)- Speedy delete G11 Alba 05:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - if you don't likw the page then don't go to it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.214.3.56 (talk • contribs) .
- — Possible single purpose account: 69.214.3.56 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
Keep- What exactly is wrong with the page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.214.3.56 (talk • contribs) . (one keep/delete only, please)Keep-this article is very viable, some information is found here http://www.lanasbigboobs.com/models/c/colt_45/index.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.214.3.56 (talk • contribs) . (one keep/delete only, please)- Delete per nom. Pavel Vozenilek 13:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This article just looks like any other Wikipedia page, keep it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Melbournes (talk • contribs) .
- — Melbournes (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep - Like Colt 45 Chelsea Charms fan
- — Chelseas Charms fan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Another STRONG KEEP - What is different about this than the other many porn stars?? alfredmakesapie
- — alfredmakesapie (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- So what? I joined and have not contributed to anything and still said KEEP to the Maxi Mounds page, many others posters have done the same. You are the spammer —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.214.8.190 (talk • contribs) .
- Seems somewhat odd that so many users spontaneously signed up to defend this article, eh? If I was not the type to assume assume good faith, I might be wondering if this was a case of mass sock puppetry. Doubly so since you forgot to sign back in as alfred and instead posted that last comment with the same IP range as all of the other IPs posting in this AfD. Resolute 04:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That's because that is my username, I have nothing to hide about that.
- — alfredmakesapie (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete per nom. Eusebeus 08:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Looks like a walled garden in the making. -Kubigula (ave) 20:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.