Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colossal Kaiju Combat (franchise)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:20, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colossal Kaiju Combat (franchise)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A kickstarter video game series which has yet to be released. The only coverage is some minor coverage about them getting hit with a law suit from Wizards of the Coast. Whpq (talk) 02:30, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral It has succeeded in raising a decent amount on kickstarter (over 100k) which does lend it some notability but then all I could find was a one line mention in this 1 and then this article 2 from the makers of SciFi JAPAN TV plus an Escapist article basically repeating what two references already say about the wizards of the coast lawsuit. 4. JTdale ^Talk 17:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The amount of money raised by a kickstarter does not lend it any notability. There is no coverage about the amount raised, and to be frank, that sort of coverage would be the same as any startup company getting coverage about funding. It would be business as usual coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 14:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 13:29, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely WP:TOOSOON. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMachine03 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very limited coverage - too soon. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with everyone above - toosoon. –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Maybe userfy first, since I have a feeling this might deserve an article in the future. Andrew³²⁷ 08:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.