Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonization of Pluto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected to Colonization of Trans-Neptunian Objects. NawlinWiki 04:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colonization of Pluto

Colonization of Pluto consisted in very large part of inaccurate bollocks, which I have removed. Having done so, I find that there is essentially no article left. Given that I know of no serious discussions of colonizing the object, the article is definitely unencyclopedic. There has been serious discussion of Colonization of the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud, but there is nothing left to be merged. Michaelbusch 22:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 23:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete A1 Rackabello 23:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The idea of colonizing a dog is barbarous! --Hemlock Martinis 00:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Tell that to the fleas. =^_^= --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Rackabello nominated it for speedy on grounds of no context. I don't oppose the deletion, but no context seems a little strained. Michaelbusch 00:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You really can't get much more context than "Colonization of Pluto" as a title. --Hemlock Martinis 00:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:BOLLOCKS and fantastical crystalballery. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.