Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collis St Hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Collis St Hill[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to have been a standard soldier, who did not do anything very significant except live in an upper-middle-class family. Notability, however, is not inherited. Otherwise, a fail of WP:NSOLDIER as a lieutenant colonel and a mention in despatches isn't significant enough by itself. A google search indicates no in-depth coverage to meet WP:NPERSON independently. In the article, sourcing is either unreliable (i.e. self-published genealogy sites) or not in-depth (like the CWGC source) Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:SOLDIER, nothing notable about him or his service. Mztourist (talk) 06:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:SOLDIER, no evidence that he did anything noteworthy. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.