Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collections (Delphic album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Collections (Delphic album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:HAMMER. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 07:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. WP:HAMMER states that "If the name and track order of a future album are not yet known, the album is very likely to have its page deleted from Wikipedia". Both are known here, so the essay you quoted does not indicate deletion. In fact, the album has already received a fair amount of coverage, e.g. NME, The Fly, This Is Fake DIY, Clash, XfM, Entertainment Focus, PopMatters. Personally, I would prefer that people wait until there is more to be said before they create articles on future albums, but given that the album is out in 2 months and that more coverage will appear between now and then, deletion seems pointless. --Michig (talk) 07:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there are limited amount of coverage regarding the album. The tracklisting is very clear but the track order and release format is yet to be announced. However, given that it is 2 months til its scheduled release, deletion is pointless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.51.134 (talk) 18:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theo polisme 04:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking independent sources. Suggest user ask for a WP:REFUND to WP:AfC on release. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.