Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin the head

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colin the head

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have very strong doubts about this article meeting WP:BIO requirements - and a Google search is not turning up anything to affirm notability. And Adoil Descended (talk) 02:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This guy should NOT bve allowed to have a wiki page - else youlll get every youtube wanna be celeb making them. He is a legend in hs own bathroom - not on the internet.82.25.19.10 (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability. reddogsix (talk) 02:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Multiple searches only found primary and non-significant links, not notable. SwisterTwister talk 02:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion at WP:BIO or WP:GNG. In a search I found only social media and primary sources. Note that "Colin the head" is a redirect; the actual title of the article is "Colin The Head" (capitalized). Apparently the page was moved during this discussion. --MelanieN (talk) 15:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Allowing this page to remain will open the floodgates to every self-promoting individual on the planet and will create a significant increase in workload to WIKI admin.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.