Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin oxlade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 04:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colin oxlade[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably does not meet notability, needs sources. Hoops gza (talk) 03:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've found some, but so far they seem to be by the Australian and by the same journalist to boot. Given the user's screen name, I'm fairly sure that this is Colin Oxlade himself that created the page. If so, I'd like to remind him that Wikipedia covers everything... and he seems to be known for his failures more so than any successes. If he's hoping to promote himself, this is probably not the best place to go about doing that since so far the coverage I'm finding has been fairly negative. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:45, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All I can find are two articles (neither of which are very complimentary) by the same paper and same person- definitely not enough to show a depth of coverage. I don't imagine that he'd want to have an article that mentions him in a less than flattering light, as I would imagine that any other coverage out there would likely be along these same lines. I do want people to note that there is another Oxley out there that plays soccer in the UK, and that they're not the same person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)
Delete Nothing notable for inclusion.Bisswajit 04:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article on an individual whose coverage appears to be only that identified by User:Tokyogirl79 and looks routine rather than amounting to evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.