Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin berton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per CSD:G3 (Hoax). UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 15:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Colin berton[edit]

This article claims notability, but I have never heard of Colin berton or the Sydney Sand-devils. It may not be a hoax, but the claim to notability seems to be greatly overstated Grahame (talk) 08:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 08:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. The testicular cancer is usually a dead giveaway. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 08:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 99% chance (at least) of it being a hoax. It also meets Geogre's law. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems like a hoax, or to use a less charitable term, bollocks. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Prob hoax. No ghits, no refs, it represents the author's sole contributions, and that Gloucestershire ranch just doesn't ring true. -- Ka renjc 11:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as WP:HOAX. Frank | talk 11:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
G3 as hoax, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.