Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colgate-Palmolive Pakistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colgate-Palmolive Pakistan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable subsidiary of Colgate-Palmolive. One of the citations are essentially a press release and the other two are primary. Plus, nothing comes up for it in a search except trivial stuff about stock prices. I might be for merging into Colgate-Palmolive also, as it's mentioned there in passing, but I still don't think it's necessarily notable enough for even that. The historical company might be though, but then if that's the case there should just be an article about it instead of this one. Adamant1 (talk) 06:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This one easily pass WP:COMPANY because it has significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable secondary sources. And per this news covergae, the company is "a household name and market leader in many segments within the FMCG sector." --Saqib (talk) 17:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am convinced by Saqib's argument above and the article already has 2 references from Dawn (newspaper) and 1 reference from Business Recorder (business newspaper) – both major independent newspapers of Pakistan. Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge. The sources don't meet WP:RS and the page has received zero attention in seven years from any user other than one good samaritan (Störm). I would be amenable to merging, but I think deletion is more appropriate. Dorama285 (talk) 19:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Colgate-Palmolive. Most sources are routine coverage. Maybe with the exception of the fine for deceptive marketing. --MarioGom (talk) 12:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Saqib. If someone opened the links provided by Saqib then they will see that there is more than enough coverage to pass WP:NCORP. If the result of this article is to delete then please move it to my draftspace. I will expand it using the given sources. Störm (talk) 18:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable subsidiary in my view in light of the sources per Saqib. Mar4d (talk) 15:13, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.