Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Moscatel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Cole Moscatel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cole Moscatel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seriously questioning this meeting WP:GNG. Almost none of the sources are valid, most of the ones that aren't PR sites are guest posts/blogs by the subjects or people related to them. This also appears promotional as the claims aren't verifiable by 3rd party sources. Googling the people and their business names comes back to the same group of unreliable self created sources. JamesG5 (talk) 07:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

• Delete an overly PR reliant article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - in my view none of the current citations are WP:RS - most are either first person interviews, run of the mill or press releases. No evidence of any better sources to help improve article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.