Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Coonce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 19:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cole Coonce[edit]

Spam of non-notable author and their non-notable book Andy Dingley (talk) 23:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One red flag (quite literally) is the fact the magazines he worked for, the awards he received, and the people he interviewed are redlinks for the most part. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 02:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. spammy poss. vanity about a non-notable individual. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 00:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete,I would have suggested keeping as assuming the description in the article is true, the person appears to have received the coverage reqiored in WP:N, however the only independent source citied appears unreliable and as such fails the criteria. An admin or anyone relevant may change my vote to a keep should any additional reliable sources be added which back up the notability claim, the only obstacle to keeping for me is the only source being unreliable. BigHairRef | Talk 06:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.