Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold feet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ~~redirect. No prejudice against a better, non dictionary-definitiony article subsequently being created.~~ Neil ☎ 20:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DRV overturns to no consensus. Xoloz 14:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cold feet[edit]

procedural nomination Article is a dictionary definition as it was during its first AFD. This second AFD is a conversion from an expired PROD that lacked any reason for deletion.User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No strong opinion of the deletion or otherwise of the article, but if the consensus is to delete then a redirect to Cold Feet would be appropriate. Oldelpaso 15:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, dicdef. A redirect per Oldelpaso might be prudent. humblefool ® 17:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Redirect to Raynaud's phenomenon per Exit2DOS2000. Wiktionary already has an article on wikt:get cold feet. Zetawoof_(ζ) 21:04, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand The Slate article shows that a longer history on the topic can be written beyond the dicdef. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 22:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If one were to consider a merger as an option, would perhaps Anxiety or Doubt be potential targets? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Psychology has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to Raynaud's phenomenon - or to a dab if you must. This affliction goes by many names and could be 'search'ed for a variety of ways. Not a nice thing to have (if you want my bit of OR). Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 08:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; the concept of cold feet is definitely notable and not, as far as I can tell, just something that can be lumped under Raynaud's. This article discusses the term's origin and, while listing a variety of possibilities, doesn't even mention Raynaud's. Everyking 09:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 22:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This article lacks potential for expansion. Redirect would be okay, but unnecessary. Doczilla 20:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Slate article shows that much more could be written about this phrase. --Fang Aili ^talk 19:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.