Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colayer (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. czar 03:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but I couldn't establish that it meets WP:N. Previous AfDs resulted in delete (2007) and no consensus (2009). Boleyn (talk) 17:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous AfD's, so not eligible for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The two keep votes in the previous nomination cite an IP that arguably improved the article by removing promotional material, and that Once Wave will be released later this year, there may be more coverage. I guess the essay WP:TOOSOON didn't exist then, as it was made in 2010, but it certainly applies here. In any case I do not see any sources to confirm the 2009 AfD speculation. Darcyisverycute (talk) 19:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.