Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cola (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. This is the usual practice for a song of questionable notability. The arguments to keep it as a stand-alone article are basically wp:UPANDCOMING arguments, generally not considered valid. If it does acquire the foretold notability after being released the redirect can easily be undone. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cola (song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable song which hasn't even been released yet. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 20:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Enough critical reception to hold its own in an article. More will be added once its been released. --MrIndustry (talk) 20:44, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note Just because something hasn't been released yet does not mean it should be deleted from Wikipedia (case in point Taylor Swift's Red album, which is released tomorrow). Otherwise, I have no opinion on this. Lukeno94 (talk) 20:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but this doesn't meet notability guidelines. Just because people went crazy when she said "my pussy tastes like pepsi cola" is not enough to hold an article of its own. Maybe after more reception is added (after the album is out), then this article could exist. Also, the Red compariso is apples to oranges. Different things. This is not a single. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 22:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is why I stated that I have no opinion on this, not that it should be kept or deleted. Lukeno94 (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Song hasn't charted, or even been released. Fails WP:NSONGS. Zac (talk · contribs) 22:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As Zac has stated, this song has not been released yet. Bizarre carl (talk) 22:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Paradise (EP), the album upon which this song will be released. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 01:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The song has received quite some critical reception an media coverage before even being released. It will gain even more after its release. teammathi (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While this song has been mentioned in reliable sources and news coverage, none of those articles are about the song. Rather, they're about the album. Therefore, I don't think there's independent and reliable sources about the specific song, which means we don't even have to look to the secondary notability guidelines. Lord Roem (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Paradise (EP). There's a chance for more reviews and charting, so redirecting is way more useful than just deleting--demis ^talk 21:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Due to recent leaks of the snippets, more of the lyrics have been revealed and the already spotlighted song will more than likely have heavy focus and analysis. It just saves re-making the page when the song is released and it comes under discussion again. - Curtis Machen. 13:46, 25 October 2012 (GMT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.216.237.252 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.