Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognitive Information Processing (CIP) Shell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be userfied via WP:REFUND on request. Sandstein 20:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cognitive Information Processing (CIP) Shell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Specific application that is covered in at least some detail in exactly one source - the first one given in the article [1]. Everything else is passing mentions at best. This may be used to some extend but it clearly isn't widely covered. Appears to fail applicable notability guidelines, optimistically due to WP:TOOSOON. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognitive Information Processing. There seems to be a problem with encyclopedic treatment of the area. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:34, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP is not an advertising site. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:36, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draftspace to allow the editor a chance to add some sources, and do an WP:NPOV rewrite. Right now, it has terrible grammar, it is written like a promotion, and the main editor seems like a single purpose account (with questionable activities). It would be irresponsible to allow this article to remain in mainspace. -Henry ^TALK 03:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There appears to be a rough consensus against leaving this in the mainspace. Let's see if we can identify the preferred end result.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.