Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cogfog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Robert A. Bjork. as an ATD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cogfog[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about the weekly research group meetings of two faculty and their students/Postdocs etc. As such this is definitely not appropriate content for Wikipedia, WP:!. If we were to start to include topics like this then we would have to add the (more notable) faculty meetings and weekly seminars in academic departments around the world. We should not do this, Speedly delete Ldm1954 (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Organizations, Psychology, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Refbombed to high heaven, but as far as I can tell only references 2 (a PowerPoint on a Wordpress site) and 3 (a listing of the lab's alumni) mention "Cogfog" at all. Blatantly promotional and unsupported by RS. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the citations are to the group's webpages or publications by the group's leaders. Beyond that all I could find were general acknowledgements to cogfog members. No evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Mgp28 (talk) 21:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Robert A. Bjork per the Feburary proposal by Klbrain, and the fact that it's mentioned there already. Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Redirect to Robert A. Bjork, as per the arguments I've made at Talk:Robert A. Bjork#Merge proposal; I agree that the group itself doesn't have notability. Klbrain (talk) 08:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.