Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Cummings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Cummings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No nontrivial biographical content. No independent reliable sourcing. The claimed awards fail both prongs of the well-known/significant standard, have never been found sufficient to establish notability, and were not viewed as meeting the standard in the long and extensive discussions on improvements to PORNBIO. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 21:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:37, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It definitely meets the citera of WP:PORNBIO ["Has won a well-known and significant industry award. Awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration"]. He's Cybersocket Web Award winning performer which already makes him notable enough to have his own article. --Croxx036 (talk) 14:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plus enough coverage in reliable sources like AVN ([1]) and DNA ([2]) to satisfy the WP:GNG. --Croxx036 (talk) 14:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet the notability requirements for pornographic actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Cybersocket is not a "well-known and significant industry award", and "Croxx036"'s sources are press releases, which fail WP:GNG. Tarc (talk) 00:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.