Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codleanu
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Codleanu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I was not able to find any articles pertaining to this person. Also, the page does not cite any references. Shashwat986 (talk) 09:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I am one of the researchers at the digging site in Baulesti. All the recent discoveries are now undergoing the process of authentifications. We are welcoming scientists to help us authenticate these documents as soon as possible so that we can publish the full articles regarding this discovery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.138.12.144 (talk) 10:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Then the article will violate No Original Research. Please check the guidelines and see if it fits. Shashwat986 (talk) 04:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - "...are now undergoing the process of authentifications" = no reliable sources exist (yet). If, and when, a reliable source writes about this then perhaps someone without a clear conflict of interest will come by and create an article showing why this person was notable. Until then, please be patient - you don't have to be first, first, first to get the news out. Astronaut (talk) 19:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree that for now this article could be deleted until I gather all the required references and authentification details so that everything is reliable. As soon as I have this detail informations I will add them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Runelord (talk • contribs) 11:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.