Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cochrane (unit)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. Whether this article is kept, merged, or redirected is a debate that can be done outside of AfD. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cochrane (unit)[edit]

Delete. Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information, and I believe that this could adequately be merged into a separate article, such as, for example, Treknobabble. — Mike • 16:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and redirect to Treknobabble (or Zephram Cochrane if preferred). Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or redirect to Zephram Cochrane. Fictional units. yuk. - Motor (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this term is used frequently throughout the series, unlike some of the other stuff up for deletion today. BigDT 18:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, what is this, Trektionary? Redir to Treknobabble per Angus. KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with similar reasoning to kiloquad deletion. Zephram Cochrane seems like a fine place to mention this if it must be somewhere. GassyGuy 21:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Zephram Cochrane. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 22:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
REDIRECT to treknobabble or perhaps Star Trek Warp Drive. 132.205.45.148 19:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep it's used commonly on Star Trek as well as in the fan community. Eluchil404 05:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Merge somewhere I guess. The current warp drive article doesn't have much on this. Thatcher131 21:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The unit is clearly merged with SI Units in the Star Trek Universe. Its importance is explicit with the idea of warp.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.