Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coca-Cola Refreshing Filmmaker's Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coca-Cola Refreshing Filmmaker's Award

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable award designed for PR purposes Cardiffbear88 (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep added refs and almost all awards are designed for PR purposes, although making a commercial is more than most. I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing (In Perfect Harmony) StrayBolt (talk) 04:15, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per StrayBolt. --Doncram (talk) 23:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the article has been significantly improved since nomination by the addition of multiple reliable sources references such as the New York Times and Variety, so that WP:GNG is passed imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.