Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coaching foundation India
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Coaching foundation India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · foundation India Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The article seems to just be an advertisement for an Indian coaching company. There doesn't seem to be anything notable about it online and the references at the bottom appear to dead links. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Blatant spam. - FitIndia Talk Commons 08:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – non-notable entity created by SPA in 2012. Loksmythe (talk) 15:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: A brochureware article on a company, authored by a WP:SPA which had previous instances under several names deleted as A7 and G11. Searching on the various company names, I am finding passing mentions of the firm organising events, etc., but not the detailed coverage about them needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 08:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT, WP:SPAM, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTINHERITED, and WP:NCORP. It's written in a cross between Hinglish and Newspeak. I could excuse this is 2007, but in 2020, we can't assume good faith when we see such sloppy PR work. We are a Charity, not a free web host. A manager does not automatically inherit notability from whom they serve. This is clearly not a notable company. Somebody needs to get fired for posting this mess. Bearian (talk) 16:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.