Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cnstimes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per A7. Was deleted by Gilliam under such. Victor Lucas 04:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cnstimes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Should have been speedied, but an anonymous user continues to remove the speedy tags. ubiquity (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An unremarkable blog that gets less than a hundred hits on Google, none of which look like reliable sources. Wikipedia has inclusion criteria, and this does not look to satisfy them. Besides that, it's basically an advertisement for the website. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:CORP. This article is a remake of an article that had already been deleted per CSD A7.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 and per above. --Finngall ^talk 15:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 and the fact it fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 22:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7. Victor Lucas 22:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above. GregJackP Boomer! 01:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.